#Firefox Can'T Resize Window Code Tied To#

If I drag the tab out of the window, or (cmd)+m a new window, I can perfectly re-size that on.Beginning in 89, youвЂ™ll notice a number of changes, including:To install Citrix on a Windows computer, visit go.rowan.edu/workspace. Client platforms window management features, such as resizing and minimizing.Simplified browser chrome and toolbar: Less frequently used items removed to focus on the most important navigation items.Clear, streamlined menus: Re-organized and prioritized menu content according to usage. Try using your mouse cursor to 'stretch' the window to fix the screen, as you would any window. Don't use the middle box at the right corner to maximize it. Then close FF at the 'x' at the top. Open it again and see if it stays maximized.

WeвЂ™ve enhanced the privacy of the Firefox BrowserвЂ™s Private Browsing mode with Total Cookie Protection, which confines cookies to the site where they were created, preventing companies from using cookies to track your browsing across sites. This feature was originally launched in FirefoxвЂ™s ETP Strict mode.For macOS users, we're introducing the elastic overscroll effect known from many other applications. A gentle bouncing animation will indicate that you reached the end of the page.In addition, we added support for smart zoom. Double-tap with two fingers on your trackpad, or with a single finger on your Magic Mouse, to zoom the content below your cursor into focus.Native context menus: Context menus on macOS are now native and support Dark Mode. WeвЂ™ve redesigned and modernized the core experience to be cleaner, more inviting, and easier to use.This however also happened to me on Mavericks on a Mac Mini. The problem is that sometimes I can't re-size a window, nor with the corners, or the sides, nothing.

And it covers LOTS of stuff, so disabling because of one thing isnвЂ™t a valid reason. So you donвЂ™t get to pick and choose which parts of it you want. But the point is, RFP is an all-in buy-in, so that way everyone has the same FP. Lots more вЂњother stuffвЂќ to come. ItвЂ™s not perfect and still has a long way to go: e.g fonts and web audio FPвЂ™ing still isnвЂ™t covered: and thatвЂ™s just items that simple common scripts like fpjs2 use. Privacy.resistFingerprinting (RFP) protects against an awful lot of metrics that can be used in fingerprinting.

Firefox Can'T Resize Window Code Tied To

It is not known if this will replace the browser/chrome sizing on new windows, or enhance it. But for now it is separate. Since RFP is meant to be an all-in buy-in, you can expect this pref to either be removed and the code tied to RFP, or the pref itself tied to RFP. вЂњ800Г—600, 1000Г—1000, 1600Г—900вЂќ)* This does NOT require RFP (see 4501) **for now*** The dimension pref is only meant for testing, and we recommend you DO NOT USE itUser_pref(вЂњprivacy.resistFingerprinting.letterboxingвЂќ, true) // // user_pref(вЂњprivacy.resistFingerprinting.letterboxing.dimensionsвЂќ, вЂњвЂќ) // Now, the new pref is a test pref, and is independent of RFP. The format is вЂњwidth1xheight1, width2xheight2, вЂ¦вЂќ (e.g. So RFP applies a sizing on NEW windows.A) Use the prefs to create a larger window on open/* 4502: set new window sizes to round to hundreds * Width will round down to multiples of 200s and height to 100s, to fit your screen.* The override values are a starting point to round from if you want some control// user_pref(вЂњprivacy.window.maxInnerWidthвЂќ, 1600) // // user_pref(вЂњprivacy.window.maxInnerHeightвЂќ, 900) // B) just maximize after starting, itвЂ™s one click* Dynamically resizes the inner window in 200w x100h steps by applying letterboxing, using dimensions* which waste the least content area, If you use the dimension pref, then it will only apply those* resolutions.

The reasons for this are:вЂ“ they interest and attract people who are interested in privacy (usually with tweaks and extensions etc), so itвЂ™s representative of the вЂњreal worldвЂќ. At the end of the day, due to the nature of sites like Panopticlick, AmIUnique etc, the results are tainted. Friction is inevitable.IвЂ™ll try to keep this short. If a little thing such as window sizes upsets you, then you donвЂ™t have a chance. But it does fix all the issues of chrome changes, manually resizing, maximizing, full-screen etc after a window has been created.Personally, I use the two prefs in a) above to help me utilize my desktop real-estate.Tl dr: If you want to increase privacy (in this case anti-fingerprinting), then youвЂ™re going to have to adapt a little. Those decisions havenвЂ™t been made.

And what drives FP resistance is tightening up the bucket you are in вЂ“ by enforcing the FP to be the same. Panopticlick only recently changed to a last 45 days (which is a good move), but this then plays into a smaller sampling (see previous point)вЂ“ some large scale real world tests in the last year confirm all of thisвЂ“ PS: ThatвЂ™s not to say they are useless, they are great for seeing what your browser returns.ThereвЂ™s a disconnect here from users understanding that while you might be in a pool of 1% of users (e.g say Tor Browser users), that the pool is massive. This is probably the best example, as canvas produces probably the highest entropy вЂ“ youвЂ™re basically always unique, so itвЂ™s the first thing EVERYONE tries to beat вЂ“ cogito ergo sum: now the results are so far off real world, they actually disportionately poison the overall result.вЂ“ results are tainted by repeat visits of said users, constantly trying to tweak their setupsвЂ“ the datasets are small: thatвЂ™s not the sitesвЂ™ fault (yes half a million is small)вЂ“ the datasets can be outdated with old information, e.g user agents. ThatвЂ™s not to say that extensions donвЂ™t also use this, but most of them by default fake randomly, and extensions arenвЂ™t even used that much (what was that figure? half of FF users have less than 2 extensions or non at all?). ThatвЂ™s over double FirefoxвЂ™s entire worldwide stats on all platforms.

LetвЂ™s say you spoof your OS and they can tell youвЂ™re not from the TCP/IP stack вЂ“ thatвЂ™s entropy. And each spoof adds entropy in its own right, not just an overall вЂњis this user using anti-FPвЂ™ing). There is no point in hiding your browser (Firefox vs chrome), or OS (major platform) or UA as all they do is create more entropy (if trying to raise entropy randomly this is not an issue).

In case you were wondering why individually they donвЂ™t really change, but the overall entropy does. The thing here, is that the commonality of a FP is heavily weighing the overall entropy value (as it should), and that means tainted data will screw it.While some metrics carry an entropy of e.g 6.1 or 5.5, combined that does not mean they convey 11.6 bits of entropy вЂ“ it would be more like. I suspect it would be hard to get under 12 for an entropy score.

There are three values: true, false, undefined. And yet the tests reveal it is approximately 50/50, and gives approximately equal weighting. Almost no-one uses this in the real world, as it is opt-in.

8 (out of a possible 1 if it were a binary result). Currently DNT on is 1 in 1.74 browsers with an entropy of. Like males/females in the world. ThatвЂ™s 1 bit of entropy вЂ“ if the split was 50/50.

Firefox For Mac Can'T Resize Window